Uncertainty can disrupt our lives like little else. We celebrate what's going right, and can grieve what's gone wrong. Not knowing what has happened, or continues to happen however, can set our thoughts on a long, seemingly unending treadmill.
Never is that uncertainty greater, than in coping with death.
HEREAFTER begins in Thailand. It's here that we meet Marie Lelay (Cecile de France); a French journalist on vacation with her producer and boyfriend Didier. She leaves the hotel on her final morning of the trip to do some shopping, but tragically on this morning, the wave of the Indian Ocean tsunami rips through the town. Marie gets swept up in the tide, and for a moment seems to be done for. She is ultimately revived, but while she was out she experienced...something.
On the other side of the world in San Francisco, George Lonnegan (Matt Damon) is trying to get a handle on his life. He works below his paygrade at a sugar packing factory. He does this, because his previous venture of capitalizing on his ability to commune with the dead left him a shaken and shelled medium. Desperate to escape that ability, he seeks refuge in a simpler life...one that involves an unimpressive apartment, Dickens audiobooks, and adult night classes.
Then there's a third story - the story of an unexpected death. It has little to do with either Marie or George, and almost drags the whole film down, so the less I say about it the better.
As I think about HEREAFTER, I find myself comparing it to a painting. When I lean in, and examine its technique, I'm fascinated by the bold palette and beautiful brushstrokes. But when I step back and look at the piece as a whole, I find its composition lacking. Few directors in the last decade have made the impression on me that Clint Eastwood has. Some of his recent films I count among the best of the decade; other of his recent films I count among my all time favorites. However, in the case of HEREAFTER, this goes against its favour, since I must consider the painter along with the painting.
Using the great beyond as the backbone of a story is a goldmine. It holds unlimited potential since there are so many opinions of what's on the other side, and the lack of any concrete proof provides unlimited possibilities. While death is an absolute, how we cope with death, and the closure that death provides varies from instance to instance. HEREAFTER understands this, and weaves it into the story. It makes for some subtle satisfaction when some people are told to let go, and for heartbreak when others get apologies too late in the offering.
Unfortunately, it isn't the afterlife that holds this film back - it's the earthbound narratives that are clumsily blended together. Two of the three narratives are adequate, even touching at times. Had these two storylines been the crux of the film, I'd likely be singing a very different tune. Sadly the tale goes one storyline further, and it feels like a step too far. Not only does it have precious little to do with the other two avenues the film is driving us down, but it's predictable. It's so predictable in fact, that the first glimpse we're given of the characters involved, it's easy to guess what will happen to them.
While this third parallel holds back much of what could be, it doesn't destroy the film as a whole. This is because one character's each for truth, and two other characters search for redemption is all rather beautiful. There's a nobility in a person trying to explain the unexplainable. The character gets that non-believing look from so many that they talk to, but can't let go since the answer isn't entirely rooted in science, it's also rooted in faith.
That thid parallel is also incapable of destroying a timid connection between a man and a woman. Seeing two very bruised people try to fumble their way through an impromptu courtship is pulled off wonderfully in this film. They meet in a cooking class, and muddle their way through chopping tomatoes in the exact same way that they are muddling through their nervous conversation. Their bond is palpable, but so too is the notion that they both need somebody to help the other move on.
And moving on, is of course what HEREAFTER wants to be all about. It wants us to understand what has happened in a loved one's death, and open up to the possibility of what could be. While its unfortunate that the film doesn't trust us enough to get that on our own, and feels the need to spell it out, it doesn't completely drown the overall effect.
What did you think? Please leave comments with your thoughts and reactions on HEREAFTER.
Monday, November 15, 2010
Review: HEREAFTER * * 1/2
Posted by
Ryan McNeil
at
11/15/2010 08:00:00 AM
Labels: 2.5 stars, bryce dallas howard, cecile de france, clint eastwood, matt damon, reviews
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)


10 comments:
I haven't seen this, but Clint Eastwood has done some fantastic things recently. He makes it look so easy.
"HEREAFTER" had some interesting and emotional moments, but I must admit that it didn't really move me in the end.
Yeah, I could see where Peter Morgan was going with the three interlinking storylines. One about someone dealing with death, one about someone trying to understand death, and one about someone trying to live with death, unfortunately the last two greatly overlap the first one, making it a bit mute and unnecessary.
A movie with lots of great individual elements that don't equate to one completely solid effort.
Thanks for the review. I think i'll pass on this one and watch Clint Eastwood in Beguiled. He was one really hot wounded solider in that one!
I dunno. My connections with the subject and with people in similar circumstances probably raised the bar for me on this one. But, I don't think so. Exhibit A: your discussion and those of the commenters that heightened my awareness of some issues the movie dealt with. I was already sold on it, but you guys just confirmed how good this is in the typical understated Eastwood way.
Interesting that the writer and director wre trying to make a "small world" movie (ala Babel) with a far more universal linkage and a far more uplifting message (Use your time/dharma/karma) and it is not as accepted critically. This one resonated with me for days.
@ Chris... Clint's the man. But in the same way that I judge movies by Scorsese and mann at a higher standard, so too do I judge Eastwood's film's by a higher standard. Hence the lower score.
@ Rush... (Welcome to The Matinee!) I actually quite liked where this film went in the end. Bringing this story back to how we relate to each other as opposed to how we relate to 'the other side' is an important theme.
@ Univarn... Moot indeed. It's a pity too, since I believe if you take that thread out, this becomes a much stronger movie. Oh well, least Clint is prolific enough that his next film should be very far away!
@ Myra... (Welcome to The Matinee!)Yesterday actually turned into a Clint day for me too, as I followed this screening up with THE GOOD, THE BAD, AND THE UGLY. Gotta love leaning on the classics.
@ Yojimbo... To be clear, I did like it - I just wanted a bit more from it. It might work better for me on dvd so I can skip over certain details.
Gonna have to go look up your review now...
Just letting you know, as you are a regular commenter on my site, I changed the URL, and the old one does not redirect. I don't know how to make it so it does, and I fear it's too late. So, here's the URL. If you could find it in yourself to pass it along to others, that would be great. I really, really, REALLY, don't want to lose all the readers I've gotten over the past year. Thanks.
http://fromthesupermassive.blogspot.com/
@ Sebastian... I'm on it. I expect to see a post soon about that awesome package that found its way into your mailbox.
I had a hard time being convinced to see this knowing Clint Eastwood is an atheist.
@ Fitz... Not sure if it'd sway you, but the film actually leaves all talk of religion and spiritualism out of the equation.
Post a Comment