WE'VE MOVED!

WE'VE MOVED!
Find All New Content at TheMatinee.ca

Sunday, October 10, 2010

Review: CATFISH * * *

While this post will be wickedly non-specific, I'll echo the company line.
If you haven't seen this film, don't read this. Just go see the film.
If you have seen it, or are just that much of a daredevil, read on.

CATFISH is the story of New York photographer Nev Schulman. One day he is mailed a painting based on one of his published photographs. The painting is done by an 8 year old girl in Michigan named Abby Pierce. So enamoured with the painting, Nev soon reaches out to the girl and her family. In short order he finds himself as a close Facebook friend with Abby, her mother Angela, and her older sister Megan.

More than anything, CATFISH wants to challenge our perceptions. In this information age that we live in, we feel we can relate to people based on what they put online. Not so hard to understand is it? I know I feel like good friends with several of my readers, even though I've never been face to face with them for a single moment. We find ourselves drawn to the projection: the ideal self that one puts forward.

On the one hand, that might seem like asking for trouble. However, recall that we have entered an era where people are dropping avatars and nicknames (well, most of y'all are anyway) and instead putting our entire lives online. Being drawn to the virtual personality is indeed still a dangerous game, but in an era where we seem to want to share everything short of our Social Security number, the danger has been sufficiently watered down.

That's not to say that the danger is gone completely. One could just fill their blog or Facebook profile with the slivers of joy they feel in their life, and all the while suppress a large amount of dark truth. There are things we don't like about ourselves that we hide from people we interact with day after day...why would one share those secrets with any person who clicked on our profile?

The hitch is that as we draw people to our virtual personas, there seems to come an unspoken trust with it. Say for instance that my Mad Hatter visage was a complete put-on. That I wasn't who I appear to be. Would you feel betrayed? Perhaps feel angry with me for misleading you, and perhaps with yourself for believing me? What then? Perhaps you'd be bent on digging deeper - on discovering just how deep this particular rabbit-hole goes.

We've all been there, found ourselves confronted with a lie and instinctually gone all Johnny-Law to get the truth. The question is, if we actually manage to get the truth - what then? What are we supposed to do with that? Will it make us sleep better somehow, holding tight to the self satisfaction that we showed the lie who was boss?

Many of us might enjoy thinking two moves ahead when it comes to personal relationships, but the fact is that sometimes we can take these self-entitled steps, and not find ourselves where we thought we'd be. Instead we find ourselves somewhere more dangerous. Somewhere sadder. Somewhere we just don't want to be.

CATFISH doesn't want to warn us about drowning in other people's lives so much as it wants us to examine our own. Are we becoming too open with strangers? What's the consequence of forsaking what's right outside our door for the personality in the profile? Could co-exisitng with something that isn't supposed to be there completely destroy our life, or could it in fact keep us sharp...and give us something we might not have been able to survive without?

What did you think? Please leave comments with your thoughts and reactions to CATFISH.

9 comments:

Colleen said...

Great job Matinee! This was difficult to review. My problems were not with the film itself, but how they set you up to think there was some huge shocker coming. I think we're all a bit too jaded by the internet these days to be blown away by any of the so called revalations in this film. Ironically, I wish they were more honest in telling me what to expept from this film. It was good and I think it's an important film to watch, I just didn't like how they sold it to me.

Vancetastic said...

I agree with Colleen about the fact that where Catfish goes is not as much of a surprise as they make you think it'll be. In any movie about online personas, you are invited -- nay, demanded -- to think that what you're seeing is not what you're getting. In fact, you could almost argue, what would be the point of making a movie in which a mysterious online persona DID turn out to be what it seemed to be?

But I also agree that the film is good and that it asks all the very valid questions you ask in your excellent piece. I'm just not so sure why we have to be so hush-hush about it.

Fitz said...

Wonderful idea for a film, but they stretch it a teensy bit too far and the film lags in portions.

Britni Burnham said...

Great review! The trailer for this looks really interesting. It sounds like there's a lot too it. Hopefully it makes it's way into my area.

The Mad Hatter said...

@ Colleen & Vance... Yeah, perhaps the whole "The first rule about CATFISH is that you do not talk about CATFISH" bit was a little much. I think they just wanted to keep the reveal as quiet as they could.

Had they not, a lot of people might have skipped it altogether, while thinking to themselves "How is that an original story?"

If they were honest and laid the whole thing out, then you might not have gone to see it.

@ Fitz... Didn't feel like it lagged to me, I was too busy thinking that the guys going where they went was a bad idea.

@ Britni... It'll seem pretty straightforward when you see it, but when you do ask yourself how you would react if you were in the same situation.

Peter Eramo said...

Well, you enjoyed it a hell of a lot more than I did. I like your take on today's era of social networking here and what is out there online about all of us...what we choose to put out there and who we decide to be friends with online. Good stuff. This film addresses that to some extent. It has an interesting premise, but in the end, did nothing for me. I did not like Nev and wanted the micrscope on him a bit more. I did feel empathy for the woman -- but don't agree with the critics who say these filmmakers exploited her. A very interesting take, Hatter.

The Mad Hatter said...

@ Peter... Nev is in no way a flawless protagonist for this story. I'm still slightly perplexed by the fact that he was communicating with Abby first. I mean, you have to wonder what a thirty-something dude is doing continually writing emails with an 8-year-old.

I didn't think the filmmakers exploited the subject either, but am still hung up on why they got a such a swell of self-righteousness to call her bluff.

I know you dislike the whole "Don't listen - Just watch it" marketing angle...but in a way, I think that helps people come in blind and just let this story play.

(Truthfully, I think more films should take that road...but then where would I be as a blogger?)

Destroy Apathy said...

SPOILERS BELOW
First of all, great coverage Hatter; way to connect it all with your (and most users of this site) situation as a blogger; and great to not get into the plot.
I took everybody's opening advice of 'do not read anything about this if you intend to see it' and I'm glad I did; all I knew is that it was about Facebook, that is it.
Thought it had its finger directly on the pulse of what is a real issue now and handled it in a sincere way. i.e. there were no rapists or serial killers, just a lonely lady who needed to re-examine her own notion of self and her own self-worth.
Regarding the eight year old girl thing; I think it's great that the film didn't even bring up this relationship as 'problematic'. Why can't a minor (ok so Angela actually isn't) connect, intellectually with an adult, why does there always have to be some sort of implied sinister motive.
Good film, didn't blow my world, but I'm glad that it exists

The Mad Hatter said...

@ Apathy... (Welcome to The Matinee!) Glad you like my style. I find digging into storytelling far more interesting that simply recapping plot, so it's always nice to meet people who like the style.

I too went in blind, and while I found the film to be a bit of a bait-and-switch, I really enjoyed what I got out of it...even knowing glimmers of details.

I'm not certain that an adult and a child talking has to be sinister...I just think that in an internet society there have to be precautions. Nev was an honest cat, but there are a lot of dishonest men out there who could do a lot of damage chatting with a child...even when the catalyst is art.

Nev is obviously sincere in his intentions, but if it were me, I'd steer well clear of that entire situation for fear of anyone misinterpreting things.

Thanks for the comment - hope to hear more from ya soon.