WE'VE MOVED!

WE'VE MOVED!
Find All New Content at TheMatinee.ca

Wednesday, September 22, 2010

Review: THE TOWN * * 1/2

Heist films are an interesting animal: They require a few specific elements to work as a whole. Mandatory requirements are a talented crew, an engaging law enforcement foil, a girl never hurts, and a well executed score. THE TOWN nails almost all of those elements to a tee.

Place your bets now on which element is left wanting. (PS: The answer will be more spoilery than Matinee reviews tend to be)

THE TOWN begins with four lifelong friends dressed as reapers holding up a Cambridge bank. The friends are Doug (Ben Affleck) Jem (Jeremy Renner) Gloansy and Dez. The four come from the Charlestown neighbourhood of Boston, an area that leads the league in breeding criminals from a young age. During the takedown, they grab the assistant bank manager as a hostage, a young lady named Claire (Rebecca Hall).

After turning her loose, the gang realizes they have a slight problem: she lives in their neighbourhood. To get a read on her, Doug fakes an impromptu meeting. The meeting goes a little too well, and the two find themselves sharing a connection - much to the surprise and chagrin of Jem.

Meanwhile, the Boston office of The FBI is intent on taking this gang down. The task force is headed by Adam Frawley (Jon Hamm), who sees how stone cold the Town Crew are and understands what it will take to catch them. The crew seems to be working for a Town crime fixture named Fergie Colm (Pete Postlethwaite), so to nab such hardened criminals, Frawley will have to be clever, lucky,...or what's best - both.

Before we get to the misstep, let's talk about what THE TOWN does right. Ben Affleck's second film does a splendid job of teaching us who these crooks are, or at the very least where they come from. The story surrounding Gloansy and Dez is a little week, but it's still easy to understand what makes their engine run. What fuels their fire is The Town itself. They are born into it...into this community that you either get out of, or become a victim of. Crime isn't a biproduct of life in Charlestown, it's a birthright.

Where Doug and Jem are concerned, they do what they do because they're good at it. For a lot of reasons, this probably comes from a lifetime of practice (especially considering where Doug's father currently resides). But being good at what they do presents a blessing and a curse. For starters, it makes them part of something bigger that isn't so easy to walk away from. The time Doug spends with Claire causes him to grow a bit of a conscience...but his seperate obligations to both Jem and Fergie make "doing the right thing" easier to want than it is to do.

Frawley on the other hand doesn't give us much to draw on. We have no idea why he wants to be Boston's Dudley Do-Right, we just know that he is. What makes him interesting is the fact that he's very good at what he does. He calls Doug's gang the "No Fucking Around Crew", and vows to be the same. Hamm becomes a worthy foil, and especially flexes his muscles anytime he gets one of the Townies cornered. It's a good coming-out party for Hamm, who shows that he's more than just a guy who looks good smoking in a suit.

So great crooks, good foil, a captivating plot thread about a community that breeds crooks. Almost every element works beautifully, right? Wrong. Where the film lost me was in its final set piece in Fenway Park. the heist itself is a thing of beauty - hit the cash box of Fenway after a four game homestand against The Yankees. For the uninitiated, games between Red Sox and Yankees are wickedly hot tickets, and as Fergie points out, a hot ticket that will make for a lot of loot after the final out is called. Thus, the morning after, the merry men con their way into a cathedral of baseball to daringly take it down.

As a lover of Fenway Park, heist films and action scenes, this set-up sounds like a dream come true. Sadly, the set-up is completely wasted. Fenway, if you didn't know is a truly unique structure, and the oldest of its kind in the entire country. It is both filled and surrounded with nooks, crannies, and character. So why the crux of the Heist gets set in the stadium's loading dock is beyond me. What could have been a cat-and-mouse chase in and around columns, concourses, two decks and one 39 foot green wall was instead confined to one boring truck bay that could have been anywhere.

Once outside, the action stays on the same boring track, with a predictable resolution and a truly bad display of marksmanship by darned near everybody. The simplicity of these sequences wasn't enough to sink the whole film for me, but it came damned close.

I recently asked a fellow blogger whether a lacklustre ending could sink an entire film. We were both in agreement that it really shouldn't, and I'd offer up THE TOWN as my 'Exhibit A'. While flawed, this movie makes good on the promise Affleck showed with his previous film GONE BABY GONE, and features some stellar acting by all involved, and some well thought out work behind the lens by Ben. Overall, THE TOWN's construct is a good one - good enough to survive what I consider a pretty bad mis-step.

What did you think? Please leave comments with your thoughts and reactions to THE TOWN

23 comments:

Univarn said...

If I was to venture a why on the location of the final battle - it would be most likely budget + logistics. Sure a run through Fenway park with guns ablaze would be exciting, but could they get away with it and still create a sense of real threat? I think confining the fight to the loading docks helped create a sense of isolation for the crew. That sense of there being no real way out for them except right through those keeping them in.

Of course there's also the whole getting permission to carry out a chase sequence + likely gun fight throughout stadium (which I'd be willing to bet is incredibly hard).

I do agree with you that the finale, i.e. what takes place after that, was a bit overly predictable. I was hoping Affleck would throw a curve ball (harharhar) at us, but he didn't.

Castor said...

Yea I also thought the film ended too neatly. I was definitely hoping Affleck's character would die or something ahah. I don't really have a problem with the sentimentality of it but it didn't feel like the most visceral way of ending it.

snobbyfilmguy said...

Although it shouldn't, endings do make or break films for so many. I'm glad to see you look beyond that fact. That's refreshing. Also, I'm happy to see The American got a slightly better score from you. I understand The American and The Town are two very different films that deal with crime and morality and can't really be compared but so many people have been missing out on The American and that's a shame. Thank you.

Fitz said...

I feel like Affleck could have came up with a better ending, but felt bound to the original source material.

Hal said...

Good review, man.

Yeah, the ending -- and the entire film, really -- played it too safe. Though it still managed to be a pretty darn good heist thriller.

Peter Eramo said...

I'm going to check this out this week. Thorough write-up and I skipped some parts I thought might "spoil." I wasn't crazy about his directorial debut, so am very curious about this one considering all of the positive pub it is getting. Nice job, Hatter!

The Mad Hatter said...

@ Univarn... No sale. If Affleck & Co (remember that this was a big studio production) went through the trouble of getting permits and working the logistics of shooting at Fenway, then shooting within Fenway couldn't have been that much harder. "In for a penny, in for a pound" as it were.

I'd be with you if the scene worked its way towards pinning the crew in the loading bay, but to not make any more use of such a location feels like filming at The Louvre, but containing the scene to a catfight in the giftshop.

@ Castor... I sort of thought that between renner and Affleck, that their fates would have been reversed.

@ Snobby... As I said, it's hard for me to completely write off a movie just because I'd end it differently. Glad to know there are others out there who see it that way.

@ Fitz... Perhaps. But that's the beauty of adapting a screenplay isn't it? You can change things.

@ Hal... Most of the rest of it I dug, I just started getting antsy when the final score started playing out and I saw where it all was going...or wasn't going as it were.

@ Peter... Honored that you read it in advance, even though it's my most spoilerific post ever. Looking forward to reading your review once it's up

Laura said...

Agreed on a lot of things, specifically regarding Frawley and the poor ending. I wrote a review and gave a slightly more generous grade, but I also thought it was a big disappointment considering there were so many rave reviews beforehand.

Jeremy Renner and those nun masks were the standouts.

Danny King said...

Although I liked the film much more than you, I'll agree with you regarding one drawback: the Fenway scene.

When I first watched the trailer, I thought the Fenway Park shot was just going to be some random Affleck addition to show how must he loves the Red Sox. When it was revealed, however, that it would be the location of the climactic heist, I got incredibly excited, and the way it played out was ultimately a bit of a letdown - especially because the first two heists were so well-staged. The Fenway one, unfortunately, not only suffers from a lack of creativity, but also because it goes on for far too long.

Darren said...

It's interesting, the reviews tend to be either "it amazing!!!" with an ever-increasing amount of exclamation marks, or just "meh". I still kinda want to see it, though.

The Mad Hatter said...

@ Laura... I too am slightly confused by the outpouring of love for this film, but I think some folks are just overjoyed to be out of the dregs of summer.

Those nun outfits were pretty badass - surprised they can drive so well in them!

@ Danny... You nailed it. I wish I could give the people who cut this trailer a smack. Not only do they incorrectly lead us to believe that the Doug/Claire relationship is some big reveal, but they tip off too much of that final set piece.

@ Darren... Do give it a look. It might not be "amazing!", but it's certainly worth watching.

Big Mike Mendez said...

of course, the REAL flaw in the logic is that a Bostonian would actually rob the "Cathedral of Boston." Knocking of Fenway Park would be considered sacrilege right? You're stealing from people, not a faceless corporation. The Sox, the Henrys, and the Nation are a family. The Not Fucking Around Crew wouldn't be fucking around in the city much longer, they would become villains of the highest order in Boston.

Movie was good, four out of five tacos.

The Mad Hatter said...

@ Mike... Sorta like stealing out of the collection basket, ain't it? Still - ya gotta admit, that is one clever plan! But you see what I mean right - why use Fenway and only contain the scene to the loading dock?

Marc said...

I thought the film didn't even try to avoid the stereotypical elements of a bank robbing film. What killed me the most was the weak writing and the force-fed love story.

Also my problems ran mainly with Affleck and his crew. Guys who were supposed to be pros and a tight unit but as they only focused on Affleck (who wanted out) and Renner (who was a disjointed adreanline junkie) it was bland. Not a bad film but trite and predictable.

High points go to Renner who stole the scenes and I found Postelwaite's role interesting (recalling his eerie demeanor from The Usual Suspects) as he gave a bit more depth to the 2D film.

Also, with today's abundance of electronic transfers and debit cards, how many people would still pay in cash? Would there really be that much at a Sox game?

The Mad Hatter said...

@ Marc... As a guy who goes to 10-12 baseball games a year, the heist makes sense.

People pay electronically for things like souveniers in the gift shop where nobody's in a wicked rush. But at the snack counters, at the beer stand, and most certainly in the stands - cash is king.

After four games against the Yankees, that cash box would in fact be flush.

Marc said...

Well ask a question, get an answer...Hatter strikes again to put an end to ignorant commenters everywhere:P

Andy from fandango groovers said...

I really liked it and found the ending inline with the rest of the movie in pace, structure and content, this is my review. I think Univarn is correct about logistics and budget playing a part in the final battle. For a great scene in a sports stadium has anyone seen The Secret in Their Eyes?

The Mad Hatter said...

@ Marc... It's a good question actually - I actually had to think it through before getting back to you. Sporting events are just one of those few spots left in this plastic world where cash is king.

@ Number Six... (Haven't heard from you in a while man, where ya been?) I still can't buy it. Even if the set piece didn't involve a long drawn-out sequence that weaves through the whole ballyard, they could have at least chosen a spot for that stand-off to happen that at least brought a better characteristic of the park into play (I still suggest something involving that iconic left-field wall).

And indeed - that sequence in SECRET should be seen as the template for any scene shot at a sporting event.

Andy from fandango groovers said...

Have been kind of busy recently, I also changed jobs a back in August that took up a lot of time. I have still been reading listening if not commenting.

The Mad Hatter said...

@ Andy... Well that's good to hear as I'd assume it's a move up. You have been missed, and it'll certainly be nice to start reading your stuff again!

Yojimbo_5 said...

Hmmm. I think I liked "The Town" better than you did, but felt like some elements just didn't gel to make it a better film. And a shoot-out running down the corridors of Fenway? Meh. Sounds Hollywood-typical to me, and considering it is a robbery that is failing, unnecessary (it's a bit like putting a gun-fight into "Titanic" while it's sinking...), and besides, we'd seen one "one chase away from failing" sequence. And I like how the film is unresolved, as opposed to have the two leads embracing at an airport in Rio DeJaneiro, say...
But that's me. As it was stated, The FBI is a national organization.

The Mad Hatter said...

@ Yojimbo... (Thanks for digging back a few weeks!) It didn't have to be a long, drawn-out footchase...I'd just have preferred it if they got pinned in somewhere with a bit more character and Fenway-specific.

It just seems like a waste of a filming permit to go to such lengths and keep everything in the bowels of the stadium.

To be clear, I liked the film, but I wanted to love it.

CMrok93 said...

I'm not normally a crime heist fan because they're so bleak and predictable; it's really hard to come up with any surprises that haven't been done too many times before (don't you just groan when every lead finally says "I just need to pull ONE MORE SCORE!"). But grounding this movie in a genius location solved that problem because it makes the characters so specific, and their choices all flow naturally from that work.