WE'VE MOVED!

WE'VE MOVED!
Find All New Content at TheMatinee.ca

Friday, September 24, 2010

Review: NEVER LET ME GO * * * 1/2

Disinformation can be truly unsettling...especially when it is personal in nature. In order to truly understand what it is we're put on this earth to do, and how we are going to do it, we need more than anything to understand where it is we came from. Not having any inkling of one's own roots leaves us like lost boys and girls...wandering in circles for answers while not even understanding the questions.

NEVER LET ME GO tells a story that I will summarize in a rather vague fashion. The story begins at Hailsham Boarding School in England. Children there are given a fine education, with a heavy emphasis on art and writing. From the get-go, we hear that students of Hailsham are special. Why though?

When addressing a class of pre-teens, a teacher named Miss Lucy alludes to the situation. All she really gets off is that the students have "Been told, and not told" why they are there...who they are...what their legacy is. There is talk of galleries and collections, of donations and completion...but nothing concrete. Not now. Not here. Not while these young minds are so impressionable.

The story then skips ahead seven or eight years. As it happens, students near the end of their time at Hailsham are sent off campus for the first time to work and create in seclusion. One such group, one that includes Kathy (Carey Mulligan), Tommy (Andrew Garfield), and Ruth (Kiera Knightley) are sent to a country estate known only as "The Cottages". It is here where their young adult ambition will lead them to the truth about their past, and prepare them for their future.

NEVER LET ME GO is laced with a very haunting tone. The film is backed by a low, achingly beautiful score...and many of the shots seem to be using available light. It all combines in such a way, that we feel like we are walking right next to these characters. We aren't learning their story from a distance; they have taken us by the hand and asked us to come along as these details of their lives become resolved.

If I seem to be overly vague in my review, then I must plead guilty your honour. However, the reason I'm being scarce with the details, is because it was my experience that while this film tells a heartbreaking story, its one where the impact is lessened the more you know. What I will say is this: all three of these three major characters seem to know that their path will go in a separate direction from the others. What the film does rather well, is leave us asking whether the fracture of this little group will lead to complete chaos where their fragile friendship is concerned.

As is the case in life, some of them seem to know more than others. Ruth for instance, seems to get a sadistic twist off needling Kathy for what she does and doesn't know about herself. Appropriately enough, during one such bedtime challenge, Ruth's profile is completely in shadow, while Kathy's is delicately lit. What are we supposed to do when someone claims to have the answers? Do we drop everything and follow their lead, or do we continue to search ourselves for the truth?

The three young actors that carry this film all do a splendid job of driving our emotions, and likewise playing off each other. There is a sophistication to them even at this young age, and a dignity that permeates their quest for the truth. Even though all three take on the world in very different ways, giving us a chance to really revel in Garfield's angst, Knightley's malcontent, and Mulligans stoicism.

The film has been directed by Mark Romanek - who has been away from the scene for far too long. He has filmed the movie at arm's reach, allowing the characters to truly inhabit the sets they work on and not just walk through them. Likewise, the adaptation of the novel by screenwriter Alex Garland has zeroed in on the best themes of the book. He has sacrificed some of their school years at Hailsham to give us the good stuff, but has relayed the story in a sharp manner...one that emphasizes young adult pain over pre-teen antics.

NEVER LET ME GO wants us to focus on drawing back the curtain of our own legacy. It wants us to know that we desperately need to understand where we've been if we want to have any clue where it is we're going. What's worse, is that when we finally do get on our way to meet the wizard, we need to prepare ourselves for the very real possibility that there is a little bald guy pulling the strings. Perhaps most painfully, is the realization that it's not even his life that he's toying with. It's ours.

What did you think? Please leave comments with your thoughts and reactions to NEVER LET ME GO.

15 comments:

Andrew: Encore Entertainment said...

Apparently this is the next one that seems intent on splitting the panel down the middle. I wasn't even seeking out the reviews, but it's interesting how everyone who's seen it has completely different thoughts on it.
Still, interested in seeing it, naturally.

Peter Eramo said...

Can't wait to see this one. Between the trailer and your review I will certainly be checking this out. As always, so well written - and I skipped a couple of parts just because I want to keep some things unknown. Seeing Jack Goes Boating tonite...so excited!!!

blake said...

Fitz gets a FAIL. But good review. I appreciate your vagueness and can't wait to catch this.

Colleen said...

Thanks for your beautiful review. You managed to capture the mood of the film and not give anything away. This was high on my "must see" list until my MSN Homepage blew it for me last week. They gave away the whole film in the title of their review! The Matrix was the last film to catch me completely by surprise and I think this one could have been right up there. Um, what could have been...

Fitz said...

Blake, I posted a spoiler warning twice. If you skipped past it I don't know what to tell you.

The Mad Hatter said...

@ Andrew... Yeah, it's amazing to see what everybody is getting out of this film (and bringing into it!). Definitely worth a look, might make for a good kick-off to the fall movie season.

@ Peter... Thanks for the compliment, and I actually tried to stay as spoiler-free as I could while writing it since I believe this is a film that benefits from low exposure.

Looking forward to reading your thoughts if/when you see it.

@ Fitz... I decided to delete the first comment, because even though I don't really think those are spoilers (nor do I have any house rules or spoilers), I think it's better if people who don't already know that don't learn that.

However, I did find what you asked about to be one of the most fascinating things of the story. Drop me an email - we'll chat about it (madhatterdot21athomtmaildotcom)

@ Blake... Now, now play nice. Thanks for the kudos and be sure to drop a line when your review of the film goes up, OK?

@ Colleen... Y'know, this has been a funny film to try and get a taste of without someone feeding you the whole darned sundae. For my money, even the trailer shows way too much. Do still see it, and keep fighting the good fight to try and remain blind to the films you want to soak up with no advance knowledge.

blake said...

I was just kidding, Fitz. I'm pretty sure they make that clear in the trailer.

Fitz said...

My bad Blake.

Hatter, I will definitely do that.

Vancetastic said...

My wife was entranced by this film, and I was as well, to a lesser extent. It's quite beautiful, but I do wonder if it has some narrative ... slowness? I won't call them problems, but I do think it's kind of problematic that the main characters lack a certain proactiveness about the circumstances they find themselves in. Is that vague enough? Then again, that could also be part of the point.

Vancetastic said...

Oops -- forgot to check the box for follow-up comments, so this second comment is merely to allow me to do that.

Joel said...

I was a bit surprised at the lukewarm critical reception. A really lovely film, one of the best of the year. You may be right about going in cold, though. I try to do that with most films, then read the reviews afterward.

The Mad Hatter said...

@ Vance... I didn't get the impression that the characters were specifically trying to break the cycle of their fate. I thought that where Ruth and Tommy were concerned, what they came across was a Hail Mary and they latched on to it.

I actually enjoyed the pace of the whole film - quiet and contemplative. Not something that mass audiences are gonna go for, but it worked for me.

@ Joel... It's more a biproduct of me not wanting to repeat other peoples' ideas when I write about the movies I see, but I swore off reading advance reviews ages ago (it also helps avoid the Dylan Fields Expectation Trap).

For me, the advance info came from reading the book beforehand...which, of course, serves me right.

Sasha (The Final Girl Project) said...

Garfield's angst, Knightley's malcontent, and Mulligans stoicism.

That's a pretty quick and dirty summary of the entire novel. I applaud you.

Yojimbo_5 said...

Well, you know what I think of this film by now..and it's not too favorable, although there are nice things in the performances. And I had absolutely no qualms about disclosing everything about the film, as it can be gleaned from the first scene, and is fully apparent in the first 30 minutes...one of the problems I had with the film. It could have used a bit more mystery and delay in the reveal. What ultimately got to me, though, was naivete of ALL of the characters (including the headmistress) and the passive nature of the students, in particular. If they can conspire to circumvent their fates in private, why don't they do so in public? Especially during the 60's and the 70's. I suppose, also, I should have embraced the "cloud" nature of the metaphor of what it's saying, but I wish I knew that was...it could be so many things, that ultimately, I felt it was about nothing other than "life is short." Well, duh. I had little patience with it, although I found its deliberate pace refreshing.

The Mad Hatter said...

@ Yojimbo... Fair point, but I don't think this story was ever really about "the twist". Hence the early alusion to the kids' fate and the lack of a jaw-dropping reveal.

I was never bothered by the fact that they don't want to try harder to circumvent their fate. I was more fascinated by the way they are forced to live a lifetime's worth of emotion in such a short time...nodding towards the fact that we are all only here for a short time.

I think you might like it more if you give it another spin sometime down the line.