
107 minutes of my life that I'm never getting back. What's worse, is that it didn't have to be this way...
Our story begins with Moose and Camille on their first day at NYU. Moose becomes distracted, and gets separated from Camille, eventually finding himself stumbling into the middle of a dance battle. Supposedly, he does well in this impromptu battle and shows up a prominent dancer (I say supposedly because I am unaware of how one actually wins a battle). This dancer isn't too thrilled with "being served", and chases Moose clear out of the park. This is where Luke comes to the kid's rescue.
Luke takes Moose under his wing, hoping to recruit him into his Lost Boys-like dance crew. ("Well, I am just about to start my freshman year at a top school...but I should have tonnes of free time, why not?"). Luke invites Moose into The Vault, a sprawling NYC loft that only exists in the movies where his crew - The Pirates - live, work, and play. They have it all. Workshops through every door, enough living space for ten dancers, an audio system made up of a wall of boomboxes...and what seems like a twelve by twenty foot wall filled with sneakers. Don't get grabby though: "Around here, we have to earn our kicks". (That one's a direct quote).
But life ain't all beer and pizza for The Pirates. See, they're behind on they're rent (I'll bet with a pad like that). They're one shot at keeping the joint lays in winning some contest called The World Jam (doesn't it always). And while a new girl who catches Luke's eye named Natalie might be the missing ingredient, she might also be hiding something (hard to believe, I know).
Can Moose dance and be an engineering student?
Can The Pirates save their home?
Is Natalie the one for Luke, or is she hiding something?
But most of all:
Should we care one iota about any of this???
Where to begin? With the amazingly lame B-FAB mantra? (B-FAB standing for Born From A Boombox. Yes really) With the protagonist who pays lip service to the fact that he's at NYU for engineering, but spends nearly every waking minute dancing? With the dance crew that follows that protagonist into a men's room and challenges him to a battle while he's still standing at a urinal? Or what about the amazingly predictable love stories, one of which actually fires off the classic "But that was before I knew you" SHE'S ALL THAT special??
Am I giving this movie zero stars because it's "not my cup of tea"? No - that wouldn't be fair. I'm giving this film zero stars because I believe that it fails on every level. Not only does it feature acting that would make the worst thespian on The CW look classically trained, but it handcuffs every actor involved by forcing them to recite the worst dialogue George Lucas never wrote. It has decided to ride the 3-D wave into theatres, and done so with silly 'comin-at-ya' visuals usually reserved for theme park attractions.
Finally there's the dancing. The dancing on display in this movie is actually top notch. Unfortunately, the film's director and producers feel that it isn't enough to have show great dancing by great dancers backed by great music. Instead, they have laced every major routine with more sound effects than a TRANSFORMERS film. Likewise, they seldom let the routines stand for themselves. Nay, in order to truly make each routine "special", it must incorporate moves made through puddles, through dust, or through every prop imaginable on a fake Manhattan street. Or when all else fails - outfit everybody in Light Brite Jackets.
This is upsetting for two reasons. First of all, there are in fact many dance crews around the country that put in countless hours spent on being insanely creative to achieve their dreams. I'd wager that their story is an entertaining one: why wasn't their story told instead of this rejected Degrassi script? Secondly, if TV ratings tell us anything, it's that there is a large audience out there for dance nowadays. Offering them a chance to watch what they love on the big screen is admirable - but insulting their intelligence once you have them in the cinema is a dick move.
Indeed, I realize that I am not the target demographic for this film. However, when I think about those who are the target demographic, it's difficult for me to envision them enjoying this film - on any level. They don't all have to be MEAN GIRLS, but hopefully they can be something better than JOHN TUCKER MUST DIE. I believe that every teen film should aim for escapism, if not entertainment.
STEP UP 3-D provides neither.
What did you think? Feel free to leave comments with any thoughts or reactions on STEP UP 3-D
PS - If I haven't wailed away enough on this cinematic waste of time, take a listen to an impromptu episode of The Matineecast that Lady Hatter and I recorded.
Tuesday, August 17, 2010
Review: STEP UP 3-D (Zero Stars)
Posted by
Ryan McNeil
at
8/17/2010 07:30:00 AM
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)


17 comments:
Sounds to me like this whole movie is a dick move, jeez. But a bet's a bet, I suppose. Thanks for taking one for the team!
Also I was so disappointed by John Tucker Must Die. With such a diabolical title I didn't expect it to be so BORING. But it was. Way lame.
Wow, Lady Hatter got lucky with how bad this is. Don't bet against her.
@ Alex... I believe I have re-established the bar for crap movies.
@ Jess... Nope - the bet backfired on her. Listen to the podcast to get the whole story on how the whole thing shook down. Kinda made it all more amusing.
Wow, I listened to your descriptions and it looks like Lady Hatter was just as screwed. But I have to say, I love Center Stage too.
I'm totally smirking at you right now. You saw "Step-Up 3D." heh, heh, heh. ::Smirk::
I can't believe you wasted so many words on this flick. The podcast was certainly enough attention given to it, no? I would've written maybe a sentence or two. You're too kind.
I'm gonna go do the robot now, and make sure my sfx player is blasting loud.
@ Jess... Yeah, my wife loves her some CENTRE STAGE. I think that's more of what she was expecting this to be. Oh well - maybe this'll teach her that dance movies don't automatically have goodness baked right in.
@ Celtic... Said it before, I'll say it again - I lost a bet. If I welched on the bet, what good would my word be??
@ Fletch... If I have prevented just one person who was on the fence about this movie from making the grave error of watching it, then it was time well spent.
And truthfully, kicking the crap out of a movie I don't like was a lot easier than trying to praise a film i dig without sounding like a raving fanboy.
I see your robot and raise you on Roger Rabbit.
The very notion that this movie exists make 2005 crack the fuck up.
This was probably the most boring movie I've watched so far this year. I have to admit, I liked the first two. They were cheesy good fun. But this one was useless and the dancing, which should be the main draw wasn't all that great either!
To echo Fletch's sentiments I tend not to write a great deal on films I watched and didn't enjoy.
@ Simon... Not often i say this, but I actually don't understand your comment.
@ Olive... The fact that you sat through the first two makes you a saint in my eyes. I'm sure they couldn't have been as bad as this, but they still couldn't have been that good if this is where the series has gone to.
@ Fitz... It's a bit of self determination that made me do it. I could have just ignored it and not given it any more effort, but it's very rare that i sit through something i don't want to see. So for my blog, this sort of post is a rarity and I didn't want to just phone it in.
Besides, tearing a movie to pieces is much easier than detailing why it succeeds.
lol zero stars? I think you would be better off giving it 0.5 stars. A zero star rating gives me the urge of checking out how ridiculously bad it is. (Not that you would expect it any other way from the cringe-worthy trailer)
That's okay. Nobody does.
@ Castor... I'd never rank something "So bad-it's good" with a zero...nor something that was well-intentioned and just missed. This is the first goose-egg I've put on the board in three years.Essentially, a massive waste of my time and money.
@ Simon... Part of your charm?
So many people are being really light on this movie, and while I haven't seen it so I can't really say anything, I just don't understand. If you are going to watch the dance and don't mind bad acting or a stupid plot, I get it, but there has to be soooooooooomething beyond that. And what I've read is it's the worst movie of the franchise, the fact that it's even referred to a franchise annoys me, and I LOVE dance and support dance and really would love more people to appreciate this art, but.......Gah, is this really the best representative?
So this was the awful gem that ignited you and the Lady's podcast?
Your reasons for despising it seem totally within reason, and frankly I give you credit for going to see it, I felt I did my part in seeing the first one, which I also thought was shat.
Ah... Here's another ZERO STAR review... So, how would SUCKER PUNCH compare to the thrilling dance sequences of STEP UP 3-D? Did the 3D'edness make up the difference?
@ Charles... Diggin' into my back pages are ya?
If you put a gun to my head and made me choose between the two, I'd take this film over SUCKER PUNCH only because at the very least it was laughably bad (as opposed to SP which was yawningly bad).
But no, the 3-D didn't help this film one lick...if anything it made it more absurd (3-D airborne slushies are never cool).
Post a Comment