
There are characters in the movies that intoxicate me. Enigmatic people whose story no films can never tell me enough of. People who should be the subject of a Dos Equis commercial. Lisbeth Salander is quickly becoming one of those people, and luckily for us all she's returned to try and skirt danger once again.
After the events of THE GIRL WITH THE DRAGON TATTOO, Lisbeth Salander (Noomi Rapace)has relocated herself to the Caribbean. However, after snooping on the activities of her guardian she decides to return to Sweden to make sure he keeps behaving himself. Their situation is one where she has her heel on his neck, and she feels she needs to press down a bit to remind him its there.
At the same time, her old friend Mikael Blomkvist (Michael Nyqvist) is back in the swing of things and is spearheading an investigative story for Millennium Magazine about human trafficking. However, his whole project is thrown into disarray when two young journalists leading the way on the story turn up murdered one night. In a strange twist, so too does Lisbeth's guardian. What's worse is that all signs point to Lisbeth being the murderer.
Lisbeth and Blomkvist begin taking different routes to the same destination: the truth. he is playing every lead he has already found in his investigation, often doing more detecting than the detectives assigned to the case. Of course, since he isn't a suspect, he can do this out in the open. Lisbeth isn't so lucky, and as if her fearlessness isn't making things tense enough, she has to get to the truth while everyone within sight of a TV thinks she's a murderer.
This story has an amazingly appropriate title. After the events of TATTOO, Lisbeth seems to be living life with a strange Supergirl complex. She has gone to such measures to take control of her life and play a part in others getting control of theirs, that in this film she seems to know no fear. She ducks from one dangerous moment to the next with little regard for her own safety.
It's as if she's become bored of winning at Russian Roulette, and decided that it's high time she loaded a second bullet into the revolver.
In the same way, Blomkvist could be seen as a man with a new found streak of daredevilism. His investigative journalism nearly cost him his life once already, and this time out his journalism once again has him threatening some very dangerous men. By now we know that he shares a special kinship with Lisbeth, and perhaps her appetite for danger has rubbed of on him. Or perhaps, it was in him all along and that's what she gravitates toward.
THE GIRL WHO PLAYED WITH FIRE must of course be considered in relationship to THE GIRL WITH THE DRAGON TATTOO. In a few ways, I'm sorry to say that it's a slight step back. While the darkness of that first chapter actually made it difficult to write about and praise, it also made it work very well as a movie. This film isn't quite as dark, which gives the overall experience the wrong tone.
One other factor to be considered, is the full knowledge that Lisbeth's story still has one more chapter to go - THE GIRL WHO KICKED THE HORNET'S NEST. Knowing that film is still to come takes away from the stakes at hand in the final act - an unfortunate side effect to what could have been a very gripping scene.
On the whole, Lisbeth Salander is such an engaging character that even a lacking story with her in it is one that I want to hear. Noomi Rapace has taken her performance to the next step in this film, showing her as someone who has obviously evolved from the events she's already endured...but still hasn't evolved into someone who cares that much for the outside world. She is capable of genuine tenderness, but can still shut it all down and detach whenever she wants to.
Can't wait to find out how her story ends!
What did you think? Feel free to leave comments with any thoughts or reactions on THE GIRL WHO PLAYED WITH FIRE.
Sunday, July 11, 2010
Review: THE GIRL WHO PLAYED WITH FIRE * * *
Posted by
Ryan McNeil
at
7/11/2010 08:00:00 AM
Labels: 3 stars, crime, drama, dvd, foreign, michael nyqvist, noomi rapace, reviews, swedish
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)


10 comments:
OOoo. So jealous you saw this first. It hits next week here...where "Dragon Tatoo" broke house records at the local art-house theater.
I'm kind of torn on this one. I think that it's a disappointing follow up to Dragon Tattoo but I also can't help but wonder if it would have made a difference if I'd gone into this one not having read the books.
I'm on the fence about this series, but I imagine it'll hit the area soon enough.
I'm in total agreement with you. 'Twas a step back from the first, definitely. Still well worth the watch, of course, and for a 2+ hour movie, I was again (like with the first) surprised at how not overlong it felt. I didn't once glance to see the time.
I'm told that it's an even bigger disappointment for those who read the book first; I read "...Tattoo" and hadn't quite finished it before seeing the film, but then caught this one only a week later (I think it's fantastic that some theatres are playing both "...Tattoo" and "...Fire" simultaneously, for people who want to catch up!). I didn't have a chance to pick up the second novel, and I think I'm glad about that. The pacing of the first was more enjoyable on screen, for me, so I'm okay with how the second felt without any realm of comparison. That said, I do hope the third installment has more of Blomkvist and Salander together, like the first, rather than the second; I felt like there was some serious kinetic energy that was lost by having them apart and not able to play directly off one another this time around. You're quite right about the middle section of a trilogy being at a disadvantage, too, so here's hoping November brings us a fantastic ending to what has thus far been a fascinating character study (due in no small part to the great nuances of Rapace and Nyqvist)! I'm tempted to jump ahead and get the book, but...hmm. I'm trying to resist.
(Also: Was it just me, or were the big plot revelations entirely too easy to see coming from very nearly the get-go??)
@ Yojimbo... I had to wait forever for TATTOO which seemed to go everywhere else before Toronto got it, so I suppose this is fair play.
Lookin' forward to reading your thoughts.
@ Norma... I've intentionally been avoiding the books for that very reason. Then again, I also think that people who claim "the book is better" need to understand that film is a different medium, and can't possibly parlay all of the character development from a 600 page novel.
@ Fitz... Rent the first one on DVD, it came out last Tuesday.
@ H... I can't complain about predictability. I had the entire ending spoiled by the fact that I decided to read the back of the third book while browsing at an Indigo.
Totally gives away the ending of the second story.
I didn't know that hit dvd yet, thanks Hatter.
Great write-up, though I tried to skip plot, because I will see it this week. Still think the first film is the best film of 2010 so far -- by far! Excited to see this 2nd installment, but I have heard much similarity to you in that this one takes a "step back" and falls into Hollywood thriller territory, which I hope is not the case....Rapace is a sensational find!
@ Fitz... happy to help!
@ Peter... If you ever want to skip the plot in my reviews, read the opening paragraph, then skip down below the second image. Everything between the jump and the second photo is plot, everything below that is my reaction.
I wouldn't go so far as to say that this steps into standard thriller territory...it's a half-step back in that Salander and Blomkvist don't get much time together, and thus we are missing their chemistry.
Very mild spoiler for Ehch: "I do hope the third installment has more of Blomkvist and Salander together." Prepare to be disappointed.
*end very mild spoiler*
I wasn't disappointed in this one as much as I was with the first, but it's probably to do with the dynamics of them. What I thought was missing so much from the first was the way the Blomkvist-Salander relationship was played out; I didn't think the first movie captured it very well. With them mostly separated here, that wasn't an issue.
The larger issue for Fire for me was just how little of Salander is in it. Due to a pretty large chunk of the beginning of the novel being cut, her potential screen time is pretty well-shortened. That said, I understand exactly why they cut what they did - it had little to do with the events that unfold.
Still looking forward to the third, though I think non-readers of the series are finally, definitely going to get bored with that one. It certainly has its moments, but there's a lot of backstory to be covered.
A step back, but there was so little room to improve on Dragon Tattoo that you can't really fault them for anything. The themes of the first were just to heavy for the second film to weigh up against, although it delivered what I wanted most: plenty of Lisbeth taking out punks.
Post a Comment