
I've decided to start a new feature. In this space, my thoughts on films I watch on dvd are usually recorded in either my Doubleback series, or in Back to Basics. But I wanted to start an infrequent series, where I take films I see on dvd and express some long form thoughts (sorta combining the formats of Double and Basics). In some ways these will be reviews, but my thoughts might also find themselves wandering towards production, context, and legacy.
So take a look after the jump won't you, for the first in this series - a film widely regarded to be Pixar's ugly duckling.
What did CARS ever do to us?
Every time I read anything about Pixar's canon of work, CARS is always mentioned with a shudder. If Pixar is The Corleone Family, CARS is clearly Fredo. Heck, it might even be the gnocchi-makin', Andy Garcia cousin-lustin' Mary. It is dismissed; barely mentioned...an ugly duckling in a pond full of swans.
Having just watched it for only the second time, I'm left puzzled at the venom.
CARS actually features some of the best animation Pixar has ever done. Yes, really. The film is bookended by animated NASCAR races, and within these sequences is some direction that is subtle, but also truly exciting. Watching these sequences reminded me of footage I see on ESPN on a Saturday afternoon. But there's the rub; It's one thing to say that it looks exactly like stock car footage, and a whole other thing to remember that directing it to look that way takes an amazing amount of skill.
These sequences are more than just high-resolution rendering. They include sweeping and panning camera work. They include cameras mounted to the hoods of cars and nestled at trackside for shots that capture the cars zipping overhead. Hell, they're so detailed they've even included the rubber marbles the cars shed skipping along the edges of the track as races go on. In short, these sequences are as exciting and well-executed as anything Pixar has ever done.
The beauty of CARS doesn't end with these "Rubbin' is Racin'" moments. Indeed, in that long stretch of open road in between those two races, Pixar takes us through some of the most beautiful artwork they have ever created. It rolls down the windows and bombards us with fresh country air and vanilla skies. We zip past lakes so still they could be mirrors, and expansive canyons and valleys usually seen in coffee table books.
These scenes are no accident. This isn't Pixar trying to distract us from a story of talking cars with a "look what we can do" squeaking plush toy. These scenes are the artists who have dazzled us for a decade at their best. They are doing what they do best, to drive home the real point of this story of talking cars.
The story, often overlooked and written off, is one of a town that has been passed by. There are hundreds of towns across America like Radiator Springs - possibly thousands. Dots of hope on a map that sprung up with the great westward and southern expanse that led the country to prosperity in the early part of the 20th century. Sadly though, as Sally Carrera the Porsche points out, the world went and got itself in a great big hurry. People wanted to get from A-to-B faster and faster, and soon interstates were siphoning the heavy traffic away from these heartland highways...and with the traffic, the customers.
Indeed, this story is easy to write off when it's being told by a Fiat that sounds like Monk, and a tow truck that sounds like a Cable Guy...but that doesn't make it any less poignant. Towns like Radiator Springs are still hurting - probably now more than ever. And while CARS is a wonderful ballad for them, the film's product placement doesn't exactly translate to revenue for towns off the interstate.
The only thing I can come up with, is that while this story is steeped in Americana, and includes a lot of funny moments ("He has three Piston Cups!" "He did what in his cups??")...somehow the film's detractors couldn't let go and allow themselves to fall for animated cars. There's something just too unnatural that won't let audiences at large be amused, moved and entertained by a canoodling Porsche and Stock Car. This might be true, but it didn't stop anyone from going headlong for talking fish.
Perhaps the ambivalence towards CARS comes from the fact that something has to be the least-liked Pixar film. Perhaps it comes from people only having watched it once, and then writing it off. In either case it's a pity, because while I came into it with memories of "okayness", I found myself smiling and laughing almost the entire way along...and indeed moved in ways that Pixar has recently gone on to perfect.
Perhaps CARS will never get out of the Pixar basement...but it's a basement I'd gladly revisit often.
Rating: * * *
Tuesday, July 13, 2010
Another Day: CARS
Posted by
Ryan McNeil
at
7/13/2010 07:30:00 AM
Labels: animated, another day, dvd, owen wilson, paul newman, pixar, reactions
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)


13 comments:
I'm with you. I've never understood why Cars is looked upon with such disdain. For me, The Incredibles is Pixar's weakest film. But having said that, I still don't think they've made a bad movie.
While I agree that CARS isn't a bad film, it still wasn't very high up there by Pixar standards.
Another reason that this film could be looked down upon is because it seems like the biggest sell out of all the Pixar films. Oh sure Toy Story will whore its self out to the video game and Toy manufacturers now that there is a new movie out, but cars remains a constant contributor to the Disney money pile. Over all there have been 5 video games, multiple remakes of said cars, over 20 race track themed 'fun centres', making Ice creams and candy and Lego will even be making some sets for the sequel. And it all seems kind of unnecessary, Pixar are decent enough to look after themselves through the light pre and post movie merchandising, so this just all screams of Disney wringing every penny for this movie.
@ Gentleman... That's the thing though - it is high up there. Certainly as high as anything after the first fifteen minutes of UP. Lest we forget that was film that had dogs-as-pilots and everyone lost their shit over that one.
Commercialism is what Disney does, and will always do until the end of time. I think the reason why the squeezed so much out of this one property is because it was so easy to - kids like cars and so do a lot of grown-ups. It was just an easy step.
If we were gonna beat down on a film after the fact for its commercialism, I've got a long list of offenders before CARS.
@Hatter, I'm not saying we should beat because it is the top of the commercialism tree, I think there are other properties that can claim that one, but it is the most commercial of all the Pixar films and while I do realise it is this way probably because of how easy it is, I do still feel it does cheapen the message slightly.
Wow. You beat me to it. I wanted to listen to the latest LAMBcast before writing something. But, this is almost what I have been thinking from the start.
I have no clue why Cars gets the short end of the stick. It is one of my favorite Pixar films. Are Cars any less believable to be talking than Toys? Than Rats?
Thanks for writing this. I hope those that have been giving Cars the shaft for so many years will read it and give it another try.
But, I guess if you're going to be the worst of something, it might as well be a Pixar film. Because even then you are better than 99% of anything else out there.
Nice job.
This is the only pixar film I haven't seen, and I've always been told that I wssn't missing anything and should avoid it. For completion's sake I've always meant to try it though, and your thoughts here have definitely pushed me to it!
Cars gets the short end of the stick because it is the film made mostly with children in mind. If this is the "worst" of Pixar's bunch than they're damn good.
@ Dan... Interesting. I've heard ambivilence towards A BUG'S LIFE too. I think "weakest Pixar" might be like bad pizza.
Perhaps you should play copycat and re-watch THE INCREDIBLES?
@ Gentleman... (Not to self, start following gentleman's blog) Perhaps. But I think an overall message of loyalty and remembering our roots isn't all that cheapened by a stock car who also appears in a video game.
@ Kano... Sorry to have scooped ya. I still vote you re-watch it. You might pick up on things I missed...or have the complete opposite opinion and be abel to write "Actually, they're right - it's pretty shitty". Do it!
@ Alex... Definitely curious to hear your take. I'll be watching your feed with baited breath - perhaps it can even be discussed on the Hatter-approved Somecastit!
@ Fitz... I don't really buy that. There are legions of NASCAR fans out there who probably love the hell out of this thing but don't pipe up about it. I don't think this is any more kiddie-intended than MONSTERS INC, NEMO, or any of the TOY STORY flicks.
@ Really cause I thought one of the themes I saw was, don't sell out to the corporations... Meh I still enjoyed it so this is just projecting ideas.
Haha oh goodness you should probably breathe! I might not get to it for a little while!
I'm starting to get a complex, Hatter. First, we (the LAMBcast) bag on this summer's lackluster showing and you defend it (kinda). And now this! ;)
Cars is bagged on the most because it's their worst, plain and simple. I've not yet seen A Bug's Life, but I've seen all of their others, and it's pretty clear that Bug's, Monsters and Cars inhabit the lower rung of Pixar-ness.
Though I do agree with Fitz - it's absolutely the most kiddie-ish, and it has perhaps the simplest story, one that we've been told time and again, only now by stereotypes in creepy-looking car form. Yes, beautiful as it may be, the design of the cars themselves is probably the biggest turn-off. (Why weren't the headlights the eyes?!?!)
"Indeed, this story is easy to write off when it's being told by a Fiat that sounds like Monk, and a tow truck that sounds like a Cable Guy...but that doesn't make it any less poignant. "
Yes. Yes it does.
Is it a terrible film? No, not at all. But it's one that's not worth my revisiting ever again. And my anti-Nascar bias ain't exactly helping matters, either.
@ Fletch... I must say that given how freakin' long y'all were talking about doing a Pixar LAMBcast, it disappointed me greatly to hear "I haven't watched it in ages" or "I've never seen it" so often in that first half. Guys - research!
Bugs, Monsters, and Cars do not inhabit any sort of lower rung. It's my opinion (having watched all but two of their films in the last month) that they have two intensity levels to their game: 'fantastic' and 'perfect'.
The design of the cars
They have elevated to perfection a few times for my money...namely TS2, WALL-E, THE INCREDIBLES, and TS3. Everything else is 'fantastic'. It might seem wanting compared to what we know they are capable of...but it's still miles ahead of what every other animated company is doing (watched MADAGASCAR lately?).
That story isn't so simple. Not nearly as simple as two buddies head on down the road to achieve their goal. It's a story about loyalty, about true values, about not underestimating people, and about that big part of your country that seems to be getting more and more forgotten by the day.
Remember too, that while cars aren't much more than rolling cupholders to our generation...they used to mean something. They represented a romanticism, an opportunity, something to be proud of. We might not feel that anymore...but I bet our parents did.
I guess my point in doing this piece runs exactly counter to your last bit - it IS worth watching again. Because there is so much more to this film than just 'talking cars'. And even if it must stay at the bottom shelf of Pixar's work...that bottom is still far above most other studios' top shelf.
Hey man - it's one thing to watch (or re-watch) one or two movies to research for an unpaid, weekly podcast - but 11? I wish I had that kind of free time. Thankfully, with four people, I don't think the show suffered as a result.
"Bugs, Monsters, and Cars do not inhabit any sort of lower rung"
They do in my head, and many other heads, I'd imagine...
I (obviously) disagree on the story. There are some appealing themes touched on, but the narrative itself is incredibly simple and been told a number of times. Hot shot fish out of water in a small town - sound familiar?
I guess the overwhelming kiddieness and NASCAR-ness and Owen Wilson-ness and Larry the Cable Guy-ness and oddly-animated-car-ness usurped the power of the nostalgia and melancholy for me. I can see that it's there, I just don't care. Cars is pretty to look at, but the greater meaning of it all was drowned out.
Post a Comment